RESEARCH LAB / PHASE 02
Experiments
Compare fixed research examples without changing the active strategy.
Demo channel connecting
Research experiment fixtures
Select two examples to compare their assumptions and outcomes.| Select | Experiment | Shock threshold | Min. stability | Remaining / pips | Illustrative n | Expectancy $ | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXP-01 / BaselineFixed draft revision 3 | 2.5 Z | 85% | 0.50 | 56 | +1.08 | Unvalidated | |
| EXP-02 / ConservativeHigher shock and stability constraints | 3.0 Z | 90% | 0.70 | 31 | +1.46 | Smaller sample | |
| EXP-03 / Win-rate trapWide stop / small target example | 1.8 Z | 75% | 0.20 | 10 | −5.30 | Economically poor |
DEMO/SYNTHETIC · COMPARISON
Baseline vs conservative
The conservative fixture increases shock, stability and remaining-movement thresholds. Its illustrative sample shrinks from 56 to 31. A higher fixture expectancy does not prove better out-of-sample performance.
Shock threshold2.5 Z → 3.0 Z
Stability requirement85% → 90%
Sample size56 → 31
Fixture expectancy$1.08 → $1.46
Experiments cannot promote a strategy yetComparison updates this page only. Experiment persistence, real research jobs and strategy promotion are later work.